Showing posts with label UFOs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UFOs. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Hatybov, Spiders, and the UFO Enigma : A Subset of the Land Management System



I'm not going to lie; I've been obsessed by the Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) enigma for most of my life (at least as long as I've been able to read).  I've got a book shelf filled with Vallee, Keel, Layne, Van Tassel, and even Constable.  You start with the standard Extraterrestrial (ET) hypothesis, then move to a military-industrial hypothesis, then to a cryptoterrestrial hypothesis, then to the ultradimensional hypothesis, and then to an orgonite based sky critters theory, and back again, and still not really have any sense of what is going on. Yet they continue to be seen everyday, and no one still has any clue of what they are (or at least is not sharing information with the rest of us).

      Returning to the enigma of Hatybov/Hatibow (I use Hatibow in each post as it appears it was once his email address), and his published works on line, I would like to attempt to define UFO / UFO occupants from the Super System -> System -> Subsystem paradigm. So let’s attempt it, shall we?

The UFO Baseline



Anyone who has seen Crrow’s or Houston Skywatcher’s videos regarding UFOs are typically in awe of what is being seen; at least I am.  I’m certain there are countless other skywatching videos out there that I have not seen, but for the sake of this post, let’s assume the following characteristics are attributable to UFOs filmed by the above mentioned skywatchers :

  • Typically shadow-esque, semitransparent, or transparent craft observed
  • Orbs that are moving up / down left / right
    • In some cases shooting apparent lasers at something in atmosphere
  • Odd shaped craft that wobble across the horizon
The feedback I typically receive when I show these clips to a friend or to a coworker usually moves along this line of progression :  “’That’s just a satellite’, to ‘that’s a space ship’, to ‘that’s a plane’, to ‘that’s ‘secret’ military plane’, to maybe, just maybe, ‘is that a UFO from outer space??”  Yet I never receive a reaction to the extent of “Is that some sort of monitoring/feedback probe hovering in the atmosphere?” Perhaps that question is not meant to be asked by design.

As Hatibow states in his intro, “Horse Diploma/Modern Science vs The Concept of a New World” table in a number of articles, UFOs are defined by both perspectives as such :

Modern Science

The Concept of a New World

UFO - occasional appearance of aliens, their study engaged everyone.Soon their secret will be revealed, and their weapons will become the property of the Earth.

All terrestrial origin UFO is - equipment for monitoring the state of the environment (such as a probe).

At a very high level, it is the intent of the Super System to set start times and initiate programs to Earth.  Also of note, it is the intention of our own Super System to protect its information and physical properties from “interference from other Super Systems.”  Quite bluntly, in respect to Earth, no “extraterrestrial” is allowed to fly to Earth from some other planet or galaxy.  Any biological structures approaching our solar system will be detected and destroyed by the previously described Super System.  In essence, the infamous Spider race who settled in this solar system will allow no other alien races to interfere with Earth bound humanity. UFOs can not be defined within the construct of the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis as our Spider masters have devised a system both to prevent other extraterrestrial influence and to enslave the human race for some unknown end game.  As Charles Fort once so eloquently stated in his published work “The Book of the Damned,

Would we if we could, educate and sophisticate pigs, geese, cattle? Would it be wise to establish diplomatic relations with the hen that now functions, satisfied with mere sense of achievement by way of compensation? I think we're property"

I would argue that Hatibow, too, would agree that we are property.

UFO Definition and Purpose

Hatibow defines UFOs as one of two things : A) a closed system for sustaining life or b) probes/equipment used to monitor the state of the environment.

The first type of UFO (Type I) is essentially a closed system providing life support.  If a celestial body does not allow for the formation of a living cell and a system of life support, a UFO is required to provide those attributes to that system.   By doing so, the UFO can support life by providing a unique and engineered frequency balance (ie octave generation) to the biostructures and matter within that closed system.   Examples of this type of UFO in Hatibow’s work includes: the Moon and fifteen other satellite bodies in our solar system.

The second type of UFO (Type II) defined by Hatibow is that of a UFO being a Mobile Control System.  On Earth, they serve two purposes.  UFOs that monitor the atmosphere move up to a height of 424 km and are able to form ball lighting (orbs?) through movement through our old friend the “tubes” and can increase their size up to 124 times in size.  UFOs that monitor the maritime environment allegedly have 16 bases underwater. 

In total, there are 3,264 objects on Earth.  There are 128 different types of UFOs.  Each type is designed to solve individual problems in the system and exist in the k-structure (if a UFO is removed from a k-structure, a UFO accident may happen).  As mentioned in the previous post, the Complex that controls UFOs is in the Great Lakes Region of North America.

What type of equipment does a UFO have? To add to the confusion, Hatibow mentions at one point that “some” objects are equipped with laser weapons; at another point Hatibow mentions that all UFOs have lasers.  The purpose of the laser is to provide feedback to the control centers at the appropriate grill or layer of Earth. 

Another critical piece of equipment to the UFO is the “protective field”, or camouflage, that UFO’s have.  The protective fields allow for the superposition of light, wherein the color spectrum is shifted and all colors are mixed. If any of you recall John Keel’s work regarding the transition of UFOs from the subspectrum, to the visible spectrum and back to the subspectrum, this protective field sort of makes some sense.

The type of graphs included in Keel's Operation Trojan Horse and The Eighth Tower

There is one example that Hatibow provides in respect to Type II UFOs and their purpose. The example discusses the need for civilization change on the planet, wherein type II UFOs were tasked “to destroy civilization in North Africa.” UFOs ultimately disrupted good soil into sand and created the Sahara Desert.  With no soil to plant crops, civilization ended. For whatever reason, the Supersystem and System dictated that North African civilization end; UFOs complied with the command, and the command was executed.

To summarize quickly, Type I UFOs provide for the existence of biostructures in conditions that do not naturally allow for biostructure existence.  Type II UFOs monitor the atmosphere, the water ways, receive instructions from Complexes on Earth, and provide feedback to Complexes on Earth.  When needed, Type II UFOs can assist in the engineering and destruction of Earth or civilizations on the planet.

Type I UFO Occupants

Who flies these UFOs?  Hatibow states that approximately 66% of UFOs act as piloted Mobile Control System.  UFOs with pilots are designed to perform specific tasks on our planet (as mentioned above).  The original UFO pilots were human beings with spider brains implanted into the human biologicial structure (ie the original ones/first ones/original gods?).  The UFO-naughts were then engineered into human biological structures excluding intestines, a digestive tract, and a reproductive system.  Another described pilot of UFOs is listed as being a biological structure up to 280 cm and having “8-paws”.  Is this the Spider race yet again?  This one I’m not quite able to figure out.  Let’s assume going forward that there are indeed two types of biological pilots : human being pilots and 280 cm large arachnids.

The 34% of UFOs remaining are computer UFOs.  The computer UFOs are part of the control system in way that they provide feedback to complexes around the globe.  Ireland, again mentioned in the previous post regarding Complexes, assists with monitoring and management of computer UFOs.

Location of Type II UFOs

As previously mentioned in Hatibow’s God : The Land Management System, UFOs exist on Earth at -3300 > height > -4400 meters.  UFOs are connected to one another and to other Complexes of Control on Earth through 2,200 meter diameter tubes.  The tubes create a direct link to “energy pumping structures”.   As a side note, the suspension of these tubes/wires and the energy directly tied to these interconnected tubes/wire allows for the flow of water on the face of the Earth.  Hatibow also states that there are gravitational units that direct the flow of water.  If we assume the Moon is truly a façade, and the Lunar Wave a transmission of information to Earth, then the problem regarding oceanic waves is solved.  The Moon does not create tides; the interweaving tubes, wires, and associated fields of energy below the surface create the movement of water on the face of the Earth.



Another interesting note on the location of UFOs as provided by Hatibow relates to crop circles.  As all UFOs originate from below Earth’s surface, the UFO is either below an occupied space or below a residential/city dwelling.  When a UFO is called on to rise from below the ground, the frequencies and octaves needed to move the UFO from below ground to atmosphere manifest as circles.  If the UFO is below a field of wheat or other crop, a crop circle forms.  If a UFO manifests below a residence, the circle is still created, but is not as likely to be noticed by the inhabitants of the residence.  Anything from internet disruption to building destruction could be caused by the activation of a UFO. If one were to extrapolate this idea out even further, we are suddenly in the arena of ley lines, poltergeists, and other psychical phenomenon associated with the concept of "zero point energy."

Fuel Source of UFOs (or Tritium)

As previously mentioned, Tritium exists in Layer II or the hydro acoustic layer of our planet.  Let’s get the scientific definition out of the way first :

Tritium 3 H - radioactive radionuclide superheavy hydrogen with mass number 3. T 1/2 = 12.35 years. Under normal conditions, tritium - gas, t m = -252.52 0 C. In combination with oxygen forms a super-heavy water, tritium T 3

Naturally forming tritium is, per Wikipedia, extremely rare on Earth.  In our society, tritium is used to create atomic weaponry, and due to atomic weapon testing, has fallen into the world’s ocean waterways and can act as a “tracer” for different populations in Earth's various systems (not Hatibow systems, but biological and environmental systems).

Hatibow, naturally, would argue against the Wikipedia definition.  Tritium, in reality, is: 
  • Is not infinite in quantity
  • Is inherently part of water on the planet Earth (both fresh and sea water)
  • Distilled through the use of special installations, or generators in the System with the use of water
    • Tritium is create through (I think) a reverse osmosis style process, wherein water is recycled or reduced in some format, and tritium is retrieved
  • Water has specific gravity of 1 g / cm 3 at rest; when tritium is removed from water, water has a reduced specific gravity of .77 g / cm 3
  • Is the necessary life force for brains of all genotypes
    • Tritium in water restores the frequencies of the brain
  • Stored on satellites within the Super System in order to provide fuel for long distance space travel
  • And, in the case of the subject of this post, the fuel source for UFOs on the planet Earth
 As with most of modern science from Hatibow’s perspective, the current understanding of tritium is incorrect.  Hatibow states that tritium’s true structure and properties are not known by modern academia. 

Movement of Type I UFOs

A Type II UFO is able to travel one of two ways.  For deep space travel, a Type II UFO needs the safety of a closed system Type I UFO for interstellar travel.  Once the Type I UFO is anchored to the appropriate planet with the use of a gravitational tube, the Type II UFO can use the “tube” for safe travel to and from the Supersystem to the System.

Once a UFO is embedded into Layer 4 of the Earth’s System, a different mode of transportation is required.  The ultimate goal of a Type I UFO is to lift off, perform a requested task, and return to below the Earth’s surface.  The basics of movement are essentially as follows :

  • A “rise” command is executed from one or multiple Earth Complexes
  • The UFO forms a conical path or array of travel to the atmosphere, wherein frequencies are generated
  • UFOs traverse to atmosphere either electronically or magnetically (50 or 60 octave, respectively)
  • Tubes are formed on the surface of the ground
    • UFOs discharge from tubes in form of ball lighting (again, orbs?)
    • Tube creation and UFO discharge generates a sulfur smell
  • The process takes 12 days for the UFO to move below ground to atmosphere
This part is very tricky to work through.  There is a lot of mathematics, octaves, k-structures, tubes, and other esoteric ideas embedded in Hatibow’s Ufology segment.  Yet I think at the end of it all, Hatibow is essentially stating that these UFOs modify their matter through the use of octaves, pass through the layers and lattices of other masses of the Earth as an object with no Neinertsionnaya weight, modify form in atmosphere my returning to a Neinertsionna weight generating mass, perform the requested tasks, then move back to a non matter object and return to their starting point.  This is touched on in respect to crop circles, and if I read Hatibow's work correctly, explains why crop circles occur in the same spots on the planet repeatedly.

I’m not 100% certain on this translation or understanding, but it makes some sense to me given the parameters and inputs of his work in context to the larger body of knowledge.  For everyone’s reference, the majority of this exists in the article “And UFO Also”.

An Example of UFOs on the Moon and the Moon


A great example of both types of UFOs in existence and working in parallel is described in Hatibow’s Moon Objects paragraph, one of my favorite passages of his work.  I’d paraphrase, but the translation is too good to pass up :

All the "lunatics" are inside the moon. The atmosphere of the moon is only necessary for the control and the existence of this atmosphere without protection is impossible.  To control the surface and atmosphere of the moon has its own objects (UFOs). It is - mostly machines, but some of them manned.  Maximum lift height is less than 2 km from the surface. "Sleepwalkers" is not intended for life on Earth, they have plenty of comfortable conditions for work and leisure. Total lunar object 242 (36 types), 16 of them manned. Similar facilities are available on some satellites (and on Phobos, too).

Conclusion

So where does this segment leave us in respect to the Hatibow Hypothesis? (if anyone makes t-shirts with that slogan, please don’t forget about me!)  UFOs, as defined by Hatibow’s paradigm, fit surprisingly well with the some key points to existing UFO lore.  You’ve got : 
  • Human being UFO occupants accounted for
  • Shape shifting/growing anomalous Orbs accounted for (UFOs/fae lights/ghost lights)
  • Color changing/color bending UFOs accounted for (the material of John Keel)
  • Teleporting UFOs accounted for
  • Shadowships as observed by Crrow777 and Houston Skywatch accounted for
  • Underwater UFOs accounted for (Ivan T Anderson stuff)
  • Underground UFO bases accounted for
  • Ley Lines and possible psychical activity associated with UFOs accounted for
  • Occult/vibration based hypotheses of UFOs accounted for
As for your prototypical UFO occupant such as the Grey, or any other number of non humanoid looking UFO pilots, where would they fit in respect to Hatibow’s work?  There is really no mention of a “Grey” (as far as I can tell).  If one were to be speculative, one could argue that the before mentioned arachnid pilot could, in theory, require a “space suit”.  Hatibow explicitly states that no human being will ever see a Spider exit a UFO.  What if that space suit were that of the Grey?  Author / researcher Nigel Kerner did touch on this concept of space suit in his book “Grey Aliens and the Harvesting of Souls” (forgive me Nigel, I did not finish your book).  Is that a possible solution?  I know I’m reaching here, but hey, that’s what blogging is all about! 

Either way, the UFO is a critical part of the alleged Land Management System placed on Earth.  As with all things Hatibow, one could argue this is pure science fiction or pure systematic control of the Earth and its residents.  Did Hatibow have a fantastic knowledge base of the fortean world, and utilized UFOs and octaves as a sort of "unified field theory" to account for a majority of fortean phenomena?  Or is the activating of a Type II UFO ultimately responsible for fairy sightings, UFO sightings, and other paranormal experiences?   At the end of the day, the next time Crrow or Houston Skywatchers upload a video with an orb or a shadowship, I personally will rule out the idea that ET has come to visit Earth.  Instead, I may very well wonder what exactly has changed in respect to our System’s parameters, or what has challenged an existing order from the Super System, and wonder who or what exactly the corrective action will be focused on.


Sunday, March 23, 2014

Top Five Scenarios of Alien Visitation







One of my favorite past times on Amazon's Kindle shop is to browse the bargain bin eBook section relating to topics that include occultism, conspiracies, and the paranormal.  You can always count on interesting radical thinking, zero editor oversight, and plenty of grammatical errors to provide for hours of reading entertainment. One only needs a kindle or a kindle app to open the doorway to a bizarre literary universe for typically $l or less per read.



Not all eBooks, however, are created equally.  I recently discovered a copy of David Barker's "Scenarios of Alien Visitation", and was instantly hooked by the author's concise style of writing and management of the topics at hand.  Baker doesn't pretend to generate any new theories regarding the origin of UFOs, but states the ideas in his book "have been absorbed from the UFO literature." The book is definitely an underground gem in the world in ufological studies and I recommend it to everyone interested in the field and who would enjoy a high level summary of ufo origin theories. So without further ado, I'd like to highlight my top five favorite personal summaries of the book, that, in my opinion, are the most probabilistic solutions to the question : what are UFOS and where do they come from?

  1. Tourists - UFO visitations include a host of varied aliens, ranging from the benign through the malevolent in nature.  The aliens may know that we will/did die a mass suicide as a race and have an interest in our planet as only a sight seeing experience.  Barker summarizes two types of alien tourists:
    • Sane/moral "tourists": these tourists hold to a code of no interference with our planet and adhere to a "look don't touch" principle.  Sane/moral aliens impart marginal intervention with our fellow humankind.
    • Amoral/mad "tourists": these tourists look at humans as game.  Earth is more or less an amusement zone to these tourists, wherein anything goes.  This type of tourist enjoys toying with our collective minds, manipulating our societies, inflicting pain and torture on individuals and groups, and taking sadistic delight in our pain, fright and confusion.  In this sense, aliens are not far removed from us.  I would only include to this train of thought the idea that amoral/mad tourists may profit from humanity's suffering and torture.  As Charles Fort famously stated, "The Earth is a farm. We are someone else's property."
  2. Mimics/thespians : alien visitation is a form of alien theatre.  Absurd encounters in desolate parts of the globe, random lights that play in the night sky, etc are a form of distraction.  The UFO event is designed to conceal some unknown true purpose, nature and origin, which could include (but not be limited to) the military/industrial complex, fraudulent occult forces, and biological or spiritual enterprises.
  3. Scanners : an interesting theory that assumes that the visitors exist outside of our time space continuum and are scanning earth's long term history much like a dvr playback.  The observers are fast forwarding through our long term progression, and occasionally slowing the dvd playback down or place it on pause when some event or situation has peaked the observer's curiosity.  The alien visitors have no interest in our present period, except to how it fits the overall progression of earth.  They could be very well looking for some person, place or event that is a mystery to them.
  4. Tulpas : as Barker states, tulpas are "living, temporal thought forms with independent existence and will, created by human minds."  Dipping into the world of Jung and the collective unconsciousness, UFOs are a product of permanent thought forms generated by science fiction writing of the late 19th/early 20th century and the unintentional result of tens of thousands of readers intensely concentrating on the idea of alien visitation over many decades of times. More radical yet, UFOs could be attributed to a super genius who dreams or daydreams, or even has nightmares about alien visitation.
  5. Control Mechanism : the UFO phenomenon is a manifestation of a single alien intelligence.  The intelligence can materialize energy and matter into UFO crews and objects in the sky as some form of an operating control system on humanity.  Perhaps a PKD Vallis type system, this intelligence is purporting alien visitation to the masses to fit some unknown end game.
BONUS REASON : REALITY WARPS


The last theory Barker touches on and that I think is absolutely correct involves reality warps.  Barker theorizes the work of the US military in the 20th century regarding teleportation, atomic weaponry, and invisibility has opened our reality to multiple realities, and UFOs are a byproduct of an unstable reality. I think this hypothesis touches on more than the teleportation of US Naval warships and suddenly points into the direction of Gnostic thought, Archons, and a constructed, fabricated reality that is designed to keep us away from light and gnosis. I'd love to write about this more, but i'll save that for another day, dear reader.

At the end of the day, the UFO phenomenon is still as obscure as it was thousands of years ago.  A combination of many different theories likely points to a solution, but when or if that ever happens, I would not garner a guess.  I believe that the question of UFO visitation will never be solved; I do believe UFOs will, however, continue to be seen, their crews encountered, and that UFOs will continue to be dismissed by mainstream academia and media.  Perhaps all of these given facts are by design.

Thoughts? comments?  Let me know!   










Sunday, January 5, 2014

Biolocation and the Soviets


I recently read Jacques Vallee's "UFO Chronicles of the Soviet Union" and would have to say it easily one of his most engaging works.  Vallee is considered by many to the world's premiere ufologist (if such a field truly exists). A trained mathematician, astrophysicist, and computer scientist, Vallee's pedigree and analytic background stands higher than most in the fringe field of ufo studies.

The background of the book is set amongst Russian Glasnot in 1989.  With the great social strain placed upon the Russian people moving from Communism to a more "open and transparent" society and government, an unparalleled UFO wave was unleashed upon the country.  Hundreds of sightings, witnesses to occupants, and even attempted alien abductions were realized by the Russian people.

There are two things that I find absolutely fascinating in Vallee's work regarding the UFO wave of 1989. First, Vallee makes note of, if indirectly, the relationship between social structure change and UFO sightings. Is there a correlation between a social structure stress upon a population and the frequency of UFO encounters?  Second, Vallee is quick to point out his interest in understanding why a Soviet UFO investigative group made of scientists and scholars use biolocation techniques in investigating UFO landing areas.

Biolocation, as defined in the book and through Soviet literature, is "dowsing, or radiethesa, the detection of hidden mineral, water, or living entities by paranormal means".  In other words, the Soviets employed paranormal investigative techniques in response to UFO incidents.  I've read many books on the subject of the paranormal, and I honestly don't recall mention of parapsychological techniques used in Western UFO investigations.


Unfortunately, Vallee doesn't quite get to the bottom of the Soviet's dependence or justification on the use of biolocation methods.  The means and tools have been employed by the Soviet researchers for some time, but the rationale for the use of biolocation is lost in translation.  My sense is that there may be some inference between energy radiated by polymorphic craft and their occupants and the ability to detect the energy's presence through dowsing rods, but I can only guess on that assumption.


Besides the inquiry into Soviet research methods, Vallee hits on many other interesting phenomenon findings in post Communist Russia.  Spending time with many researchers, the book includes fascinating revelations regarding :

  • The Perm Region or M-Zone : similar to our own Skinwalker Ranch Basin, Europe's Hoia-Baciu Forest, and other anomalous areas around globe, the Perm region features UFOs, occupants, poltergeist activity, electrical disturbances, and other paranormal activity.  The chapter highlighting some of the cases received by one Russian researcher in that area is one of the better chapters of the book

  • Magonian Correlations : on more than one occasion, Russian researchers point out that parallels made between Vallee's work in the West and Soviet work completed over the past decades.  References made to "fairy folk" behavior, sightings, and encounters are noted in the Soviet Union in respect to UFO activity.  One case documented went so far to state that a tall occupant dressed in silver boots and overalls approached a homeowner, asked the homeowner for food, and then later stole the balance of the homeowner's food when the owner went to work.  As with many similar situations, the homeowner and his wife had serious relationship issues after the incident and the two nearly divorced.

  • Data collection bias : unlike so many Western researchers, Vallee highly commends Soviet researcher ability to collect and analyze ALL data points.  So often, the past Western researcher ignores cases/incidents that don't fit the researcher's theory.  Occupant encounters that don't resemble large black eyed, diminutive grey beings are not ignored but instead are included in the Soviet data sets. Perhaps with no motive to sell books or movies, the Soviets have no agenda to slice and dice the data as they see fit.  To the West's credit, many investigators are now moving in this Vallee/Keel direction of modern research.
The book isn't to say the state of Soviet ufology is perfect.  Vallee's points out his concern with the Soviet's use of hypnotic regression as a research tool.  I do not pretend to be an expert in hypnosis, but my understanding is that hypnotic regression outcomes are easily influenced by the person conducting the hypnosis.  This was a big "to do" of late on the Web and podcasts in respect to the Dr Jacob's work, but it is obvious that legitimate UFO research has pointed out the inherent flaws of regression over the past forty years.  

All that said, please check out the book.  The book does a great job of cataloging the initial impact of "social openness" in post Communist Russian.  Examples given of the mood (and gloom) of the population, the paranoia of Vallee and his companions towards Russian security, and the heated debates between Vallee and the Soviety UFO community and Soviet academia are fascinating in and of themselves.  And, as a followup to the book, one will be left to ask "has any further research been made in respect to biolocation methods?"  One follow up for me is to further research the question.  

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Blundering in Where Angels Might be Terrorized


One of the best list of UFO related axioms I have ever read comes from Trevor James Constable and his work "The Cosmic Pulse of Life".  Among the list, Constable's working hypothesis regarding UFOs includes:

  • UFOs are spaceships, but their vibratory makeup is not fixed in the physical material density; they are mutants
  • UFOs have their main existence in a density that is invisible to human beings of normal vision
  • There are normally invisible living things in space that are not spaceships
  • Space is filled with primary energy currents of which existing earth science knows nothing
  • Infrared film, exposed between dawn and sunrise in high, drive locales will frequently objectify invisible objects of various kinds living in a passing through the atmosphere
I'm still not quite through the book, but I continue to find Constable's work absolutely fascinating.  His approach and exercises continue to be amazing (although I have yet to attempt to burst a cloud).  Of course, having a western scientific minded approach to such things begs the question : wouldn't it be excellent to have an area of the globe that etheric and orgone experiments could be held with complete experiment objectivity?  Well, I believe such a place may indeed exist : Hoia Baciu Forest in the country of Romania.

Again, Ghost Adventures provides some very synchronous experiences in respect to the life of this blogger. On their recent Halloween special, the trio traveled to Romania to investigate the locales of the Vlad the Impaler, but more interestingly, decided to investigate Hoia Baciu Forest.  During the show, images photographed by 1960's Romanian military technicians were displayed; a couple of the images immediately struck me as being of the "sky critter" origin.  The group even encountered and replayed a famous Keelian orb; a sphere that changed in size, changed colors, and then disappeared from view.  The orb was luminescent enough to bounce light off of nearby trees and branches.  

Of more interest is another paranormal "reality" show's experience in Hoia Baciu.  The SYFY show Destination Truth also encountered bizarre lights in the tree line, as well as a frightening encounter with an invisible force that literally knocked an investigator backwards.  Quite an episode; I remember the cast looking quite disturbed when investigating the area.

So where does that leave the discussion?  Could it all be hoaxed?  Of course it could all be fake.  However, I would highly recommend readers to watch both the Destination Truth episode and the Ghost Adventures episode for starters.  I would also recommend readers to look at the photographs of Emil Barnea and Florin Gheorghita on the web.  And without a doubt, please read the works of Meade Layne and Constable.  I have no doubt (again, just my theory; I don't have proof) that the energy behind the occult and the ufo phenomenon are one in the same.

Should this author have the opportunity to win the lottery, I will most certainly put a call to volunteers to assist with the purchase of equipment, the design of experiments, and to travel with me to perform a legitimate study of the Hoia Baciu Forest.  Don't expect a Nobel Prize, but the work would no doubt peel a layer away to the true realities around us all.  

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

A Journey into the Occult


I recently began reading a copy of Trevor James Constable's "The Cosmic Pulse of Life", and I have to say it is an absolutely brilliant, original and thought provoking UFO book.  UFOs, Etherians, Orgone, cloud busting, vision ray, and most interesting of all, the development and use of occult energy sensibilities fill every chapter of the book.  Not only does Constable discuss the various ideas, but he also discusses exercises with photographic film and mind exercises that will provide the reader the ability to see the "other side of reality's veil".  Whether I am able to burst a cloud or film an etherian in the short term future remains to be seen, but it is a very fascinating book nonetheless, and I look forward to writing about some of Constable's ideas in the future.

In the meantime, I've begun digging into some of Constable's literature recommendations.  He's recommended the work of George Van Tassel, occultism, and of course Meade Layne.  He has also recommended articles of the magazine (at least in the 50's, 60's and 70's) from The Flying Saucer Review. Immediately, I went to Amazon and ordered a used copy of the book "Encounter Cases from Flying Saucer Review" and plan to start it tonight.  From the intro by editor at that time Charles Bowden, the book should not disappoint.

From the table of contents, high strangeness should abound in the paperback's pages.  Cases/chapters include :

  • Teleportations
  • The Vilvadore Humanoid
  • The Little Electric Man
  • and last but not least "Berserk : Encounter with a UFO Creature"
My understanding is that The Flying Saucer Review was considered THE top notch research ufological periodical during the height of the Cold War.  I have a sense that the cases will lead one to question our conventional "go to" theory regarding all "occupant" encounters as ETH in nature.  I will follow up with some of my thoughts on the chapters discussed in the book in the coming days.  Stay tuned!




Thursday, September 12, 2013

An Alaskan Snowstorm for an Etherian?


I am no stranger to snowstorms, and on the rare occasion, the raging blizzard.  I have little love for tons of snow having spent the majority of my life in the North, but it is something we all come to terms with.  The three other seasons make the winter endurable, right?

How much better would the winter be if you were able to spend a night with an "occupant" who was a) non threatening and b) non pervasive?  I most certainly would.

And so such a thing happened to a certain snow plow driver in Alaska a few years ago.  While working a desolate stretch of highway in Alaska during a -70 F blizzard, an Alaskan Native by the name of Ross came upon a disk shaped object with orange round lights in the middle of the highway.  Upon reaching 20 ft of the disk, Ross's truck became disabled; Ross was not able to radio his dispatcher for help and his truck's engine turned off.  The craft then turned "blinding white lights" on and the craft moved upward and out of site.

Ross, panicked, feared that his truck's engine would not turn over and he would be stranded in the blizzard, but as with many a encounter, once the craft disappeared, the truck's operations returned.  Slowing moving the truck and its plow forward, the truck then hit a bump in the road.  Ross stopped the truck, buttoned up his parka and prepared to step outside the truck's cab, expecting to find something in the road.  Instead, a hand reached up to his window and knocked on it; a second, four digit hand appeared next to it.  Ross then turned the cab's interior light on and saw a face staring back him.  The face was covered with a protective apparatus and had large, dark black eyes.  The occupant then turned back, ran from the cab and disappeared into a cover of trees along the side of the road.

Ross's initial thought was to follow suit, but knowing that leaving the safety of his truck and into the dizzying night of a blizzard was most certainly deadly, he looked forward, preparing to continue on with his route.  At that time, the occupant was standing in front of the truck, in the middle of the road.  Ross was able to ascertain the occupant was cold and that the occupant was blaming Ross for its dilemma.  Ross invited the occupant into the truck, but the occupant refused.  Ross then let the occupant know that he would not allow it to freeze to death and would not leave the area until the occupant joined him in his cab.  Suddenly, the occupant was sitting beside him, and then rode shot gun for the remainder of the route until the flying disc returned.  At that point, the occupant again transported instantly to the exterior of the truck, waived/saluted back to Ross, and disappeared into the craft.  The craft again flew away.

I read this account in Ardy Sixkiller Clarke's excellent book "Encounters with Star People : Untold Stories of American Indians".  The book retells encounters with various "beings"; some encounters are more conventional, others, like the one above, are highly strange.

So what exactly happened to Ross?  Did Ross experience an abnormal dream, hypothermia induced visions, or did he encounter an actual occupant.  The occupant's telepathic conversation and explanation that "he" and his crewmates were caught by surprise by Ross's truck, that the crew was taking "snow samples", that the crew and craft were not to interact with humans, and that the crew panicked and left the eventual shotgun riding occupant behind in mistake...these, to me anyway, are all very conventional, human type reasoning ideas.  If the occupant could move from space to space without walking, yet ran away from Ross initially, and needed a flying disk to visit earth...all of this seems highly suspicious.  What exactly did Ross (if Ross did in fact encounter "something") meet that night?  I would venture a guess that if the story is true, the occupants were not extraterrestrial, but something much more earthly.  Something akin to the fairies, elementals, and etherians that may roam the same space as we do.  Something that pretends to be here for "scientific reasons", something that pretends to be extraterrestrial and creates a story to fit that agenda.

Whatever the agenda may be, the story is absolutely fascinating.  I would recommend Clarke's book to all if you have any interest in encounters.  She has been interviewed on Binnall of America and the Paracast (if podcasts are your thing).  I do hope to explore some "agenda" ideas in the near future through this blog.